Timothy Rollins is quick to make very provocative claims about feminism. But why should anyone consider him qualified?
Rollins creates an argument that is highly dependent on the emotional response of unfair or unethical situations. But the way he presents the material does not distinguish himself as anything but a venting misogynist. The author makes multiple broad, blanket statements about the "twisted" nature of feminism with no actual evidence or statistics to back him up.
The author is a self-pronounced extreme conservative which only goes to add less credibility to his argument due to his bias. He has nothing credible to his name. No one should read Rollins article without anything less than a shaker-full of salt.
I agree. Rollings does not have any facts to back up what he is saying. But is there anyway he at least credible? How did you find this article? Was it published on a sort of credible website? I don't understand how a 1998 article can still be easy to find if it isn't at least a little bit credible.
ReplyDelete